address grammatical concern and wording (typically -> sometimes)

index.html

@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ <h2>Tips for achieving consensus</h2>
 
 <p>Frequently, many different conflicting constraints are posited about proposals, and the committee collectively may make tradeoffs selecting a particular design even though it compromises one or more constraints.
 
-<p>Given that consensus on Stage 3 means "the solution is complete", i.e., all open design issues have been resolved including anticipated implementation and ecosystem compatibility issues. All TC39 participants should validate the design of proposals they care about before granting Stage 3 consensus. Stage 3 proposals which have fulfilled the acceptance criteria for Stage 4 may not be withheld from advancement unless the issue raised is related to implementation experience or identifies a problem or information which has not previously been discussed by the committee. The intention is to allow implementers to invest in implementations, and maintain the significance of stage 3 in the process.
+<p>Given that consensus on Stage 3 means "the solution is complete" (i.e., all open design issues have been resolved including anticipated implementation and ecosystem compatibility issues), all TC39 participants should validate the design of proposals they care about before granting Stage 3 consensus. Stage 3 proposals which have fulfilled the acceptance criteria for Stage 4 may not be withheld from advancement unless the issue raised is related to implementation experience or identifies a problem or information which has not previously been discussed by the committee. The intention is to allow implementers to invest in implementations, and maintain the significance of stage 3 in the process.
 
 </div>
 <div class="green">
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ <h2>In cases where the committee does not come to consensus</h2>
 
 <p>The committee may come to a point where consensus is not reached in committee regarding the feature. In this case, the committee must record a good description of why a proposal did not advance. This should be done both in the meeting notes and within an issue in the proposal's tracker, but not limited to those. This allows us to understand issues in the proposal and similar proposals in a coherent way.
 
-<p>There are two forms that this typically takes, the first is the violation of a constraint and the other is colloquially known as a block.
+<p>There are two forms that this sometimes takes, the first is the violation of a constraint and the other is colloquially known as a block.
 
 <p>In the first case, delegates may consider that the violation of a constraint is sufficiently serious reason to withhold their consensus for stage advancement. The dissenting delegate(s) and the champion(s) should work together accordingly to resolve the issue.