feat[mixpanel]: integration of mix panel for analytics #43
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to various files within the backend and frontend of the application. Key updates include enhancements to user-related endpoints in the FastAPI backend, specifically improving user retrieval and error handling in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release/v0.3.2 #43 +/- ##
=================================================
Coverage ? 60.15%
=================================================
Files ? 37
Lines ? 1719
Branches ? 0
=================================================
Hits ? 1034
Misses ? 685
Partials ? 0 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
frontend/src/lib/mixpanelLib.ts (2)
1-4: Consider potential circular dependencies with direct service importThe direct import from
@/services/usercould lead to circular dependencies if the user service also needs to track events. Consider moving the user data interface to a separate types file.
1-53: Enhance type safety and add GDPR compliance featuresConsider the following architectural improvements:
- Add TypeScript types for event names and properties
- Implement a cleanup mechanism for testing
- Add functionality to disable tracking for GDPR compliance
// Add at the beginning of the file: export type MixpanelEvent = | { name: 'User Signed Up'; props: { method: string } } | { name: 'Project Created'; props: { projectId: string } } // Add more event types here // Add before trackEvent: let isTrackingEnabled = true; export const disableTracking = () => { isTrackingEnabled = false; // Clear user data if needed mixpanelInstance?.reset(); }; // Modify trackEvent signature: const trackEvent = async <T extends MixpanelEvent>( eventName: T['name'], eventProps: T['props'] ): Promise<void> => { if (!isTrackingEnabled) return; // ... rest of the function };frontend/src/services/user.tsx (1)
Line range hint
5-30: Consider implementing a centralized analytics service.The current implementation tightly couples business logic with analytics tracking. Consider the following architectural improvements:
- Create a dedicated analytics service to handle all tracking
- Implement user opt-out functionality
- Standardize event names and properties
- Add proper typing for analytics events
Example implementation:
// src/services/analytics/index.ts interface AnalyticsEvent { name: 'API Key Request' | 'API Key Activation' | /* other events */; properties: Record<string, unknown>; } class AnalyticsService { private enabled: boolean; track(event: AnalyticsEvent): void { if (!this.enabled) return; // Add user consent check // Add data sanitization trackEvent(event.name, event.properties); } }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 18-18: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is useless.
An unnecessary catch clause can be confusing.
Unsafe fix: Remove the try/catch clause.(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
frontend/src/services/processes.tsx (1)
39-39: Consider implementing a more robust analytics layer.The current implementation directly integrates analytics into the business logic. Consider these architectural improvements:
- Implement an analytics wrapper that handles errors gracefully
- Use a queue-based system for analytics events
- Consider implementing an analytics middleware
Example implementation of an analytics wrapper:
// frontend/src/lib/analytics.ts export const trackAnalytics = async (eventName: string, data: any) => { try { await trackEvent(eventName, data); } catch (error) { console.error('Analytics error:', error); // Optionally queue failed events for retry } };Then update the process tracking:
- trackEvent("Start Process", data); + await trackAnalytics("Start Process", data);backend/app/api/v1/user.py (1)
Line range hint
1-116: Architectural suggestion: Consider implementing rate limiting.Given that this is an analytics integration PR and the endpoints handle API key management and usage data, it would be beneficial to implement rate limiting to prevent abuse.
Consider:
- Using FastAPI's built-in middleware for rate limiting
- Implementing per-endpoint limits, especially for:
/request-api-key/usage/save-api-key- Adding request logging for analytics tracking
Would you like me to provide an example implementation of rate limiting middleware?
frontend/src/services/projects.tsx (1)
Line range hint
155-166: Add event tracking and input validation to UpdateProjectTo maintain consistency with the CreateProject function and ensure data integrity:
- Add Mixpanel event tracking for project updates
- Add input validation for project name and description
Here's the suggested implementation:
export const UpdateProject = async ( projectId: string, data: { name: string; description: string } ) => { + if (!projectId?.trim()) { + throw new Error("Project ID is required"); + } + if (!data.name?.trim()) { + throw new Error("Project name is required"); + } try { const response = await PutRequest(`${projectsApiUrl}/${projectId}`, data); + trackEvent("Project updated", { + projectId, + hasDescription: !!data.description, + status: "success" + }); return response; } catch (error) { + trackEvent("Project updated", { + projectId, + status: "error", + errorType: error.name + }); throw error; } };frontend/src/app/(editor)/projects/[projectId]/processes/[processId]/csv/page.tsx (1)
12-12: Consider centralizing analytics event naming and properties.To maintain consistency across the application, consider:
- Creating a centralized analytics events enum/constants
- Implementing a type-safe event tracking interface
- Documenting standard event property structures
Example implementation in
mixpanelLib.ts:export enum AnalyticsEvents { CSV_PREVIEW_OPENED = 'csv_preview_opened', CSV_DOWNLOAD_COMPLETED = 'csv_download_completed', CSV_DOWNLOAD_FAILED = 'csv_download_failed', // ... other events } type BaseEventProperties = { status: 'success' | 'error'; timestamp?: string; error_type?: string; } export function trackEvent( event: AnalyticsEvents, properties: BaseEventProperties ): void;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
frontend/yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- backend/app/api/v1/user.py (1 hunks)
- frontend/.env.example (1 hunks)
- frontend/package.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/(editor)/projects/[projectId]/processes/[processId]/csv/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- frontend/src/lib/mixpanelLib.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/services/processes.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/services/projects.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/services/user.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks
frontend/.env.example
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
frontend/package.json (1)
21-21: LGTM! Mixpanel dependencies are correctly configured.The addition of
mixpanel-browserand its TypeScript types is appropriate for analytics integration. Both packages are using the latest stable versions with proper version ranges.Also applies to: 27-27
frontend/src/services/user.tsx (1)
5-5: LGTM! Clean import of analytics tracking.The import is properly organized with other imports and follows the centralized analytics setup pattern.
frontend/src/services/processes.tsx (1)
9-9: Verify Mixpanel initialization in mixpanelLib.Let's ensure that Mixpanel is properly initialized before tracking events.
backend/app/api/v1/user.py (1)
Line range hint
1-116: Consistency improvement: Standardize error handling patterns.The file shows inconsistent error handling patterns:
save_user_api_key: Uses bare except with custom 400get_user_usage: Uses try-except with specific exceptionsget_me: No error handling- Some endpoints check for missing users, others don't
Consider implementing a consistent error handling approach:
- Define custom exception classes
- Create an exception handler middleware
- Use specific exceptions for different error cases
Here's a suggested pattern:
from fastapi import HTTPException from typing import Optional class UserNotFoundError(HTTPException): def __init__(self, detail: Optional[str] = "User not found"): super().__init__(status_code=404, detail=detail) class InvalidAPIKeyError(HTTPException): def __init__(self, detail: Optional[str] = "Invalid API key"): super().__init__(status_code=400, detail=detail) # Then in your endpoints: if not users: raise UserNotFoundError()Let's check if there are any existing error handling patterns:
#!/bin/bash # Search for custom exceptions echo "Searching for exception classes..." rg "class.*Error.*Exception" # Search for error handling patterns echo "Searching for error handling patterns..." rg "raise.*HTTP.*Exception"frontend/src/services/projects.tsx (1)
12-12: LGTM: Clean import statement additionThe import statement for the Mixpanel tracking function is well-placed and follows the project's import conventions.
frontend/src/app/(editor)/projects/[projectId]/processes/[processId]/csv/page.tsx (1)
12-12: LGTM: Clean import of analytics tracking.The import is properly organized and uses the correct module alias.
frontend/src/app/(editor)/projects/[projectId]/processes/[processId]/csv/page.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/app/(editor)/projects/[projectId]/processes/[processId]/csv/page.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
frontend/.env.example (1)
1-3: Enhance documentation and formattingConsider the following improvements:
- Add comments explaining the purpose of each environment variable
- Add a newline at the end of the file
- Consider grouping related variables together
Here's the suggested structure:
+# API Configuration NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL=http://localhost:3000/api/v1 NEXT_PUBLIC_STORAGE_URL=http://localhost:3000/api/assets + +# Analytics Configuration NEXT_PUBLIC_MIXPANEL_TOKEN=your_mixpanel_token_here +🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- frontend/.env.example (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/lib/mixpanelLib.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/services/user.tsx (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- frontend/src/lib/mixpanelLib.ts
- frontend/src/services/user.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks
frontend/.env.example
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
frontend/.env.example (1)
1-3: Verify Mixpanel configuration in the codebaseLet's ensure the Mixpanel integration is properly configured across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Mixpanel integration is properly configured and used
The Mixpanel implementation is well-structured with:
- Proper initialization using environment variable
- User identification and tracking
- Centralized tracking through
mixpanelLib.ts- Consistent usage across multiple services (user, projects, processes)
- Appropriate error handling for missing tokens
- No hardcoded tokens in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Mixpanel configuration and usage # Test 1: Check for Mixpanel initialization echo "Checking Mixpanel initialization..." rg -l "mixpanel.init|mixpanel.track" frontend/src # Test 2: Verify environment variable usage echo "Checking environment variable usage..." rg "NEXT_PUBLIC_MIXPANEL_TOKEN" frontend/src # Test 3: Look for any hardcoded Mixpanel tokens echo "Checking for hardcoded tokens..." rg "f2e8a71ab2bde33ebf346c5abf6ba9fa" --type-not=gitLength of output: 547
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the Mixpanel initialization and tracking implementation echo "Checking Mixpanel implementation in mixpanelLib.ts..." cat frontend/src/lib/mixpanelLib.ts # Let's also check for any Mixpanel usage across the codebase echo -e "\nChecking Mixpanel usage across the codebase..." rg "mixpanelLib" frontend/src -A 2 # Check for any other potential analytics or tracking implementations echo -e "\nChecking for other analytics implementations..." rg -i "analytics|track|event" frontend/src/lib -A 2Length of output: 3588
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
| NEXT_PUBLIC_STORAGE_URL=http://localhost:3000/api/assets | ||
| NEXT_PUBLIC_MIXPANEL_TOKEN=f2e8a71ab2bde33ebf346c5abf6ba9fa |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security Risk: Remove the actual Mixpanel token from the example file
The Mixpanel token appears to be a real API token. Exposing actual tokens in version control is a security risk as they could be misused if compromised.
Replace the actual token with a placeholder value:
-NEXT_PUBLIC_MIXPANEL_TOKEN=f2e8a71ab2bde33ebf346c5abf6ba9fa
+NEXT_PUBLIC_MIXPANEL_TOKEN=your_mixpanel_token_hereAdditionally, if this is a real token, please:
- Invalidate this token immediately
- Generate a new token
- Update the token in your deployment environments
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| NEXT_PUBLIC_MIXPANEL_TOKEN=f2e8a71ab2bde33ebf346c5abf6ba9fa | |
| NEXT_PUBLIC_MIXPANEL_TOKEN=your_mixpanel_token_here |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
* feat[MIX_PANEL]: integrate mix panel for analytics * fix: make debug optional based on the environment Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: remove api key tracking from event tracking Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: correct mixpanel variable name * lint: fix prettier --------- Co-authored-by: Gabriele Venturi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores