Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

revert: change bech32 prefix back to init #48

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hallazzang
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This reverts commit 65734d1.

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@hallazzang hallazzang self-assigned this Jul 10, 2024
@hallazzang hallazzang requested review from manu0466 and RiccardoM July 10, 2024 17:22
@hallazzang hallazzang marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2024 17:27
@RiccardoM RiccardoM merged commit f287949 into main Jul 10, 2024
17 checks passed
@RiccardoM RiccardoM deleted the hallazzang/revert-39 branch July 10, 2024 18:46
hallazzang added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
## Description

This reverts commit 65734d1.

Closes: #XXXX

<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the
files that
are the most critical to review. -->

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is
not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type
prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json)
in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR
Targeting](https://github.com/desmos-labs/desmos/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building
modules](https://docs.cosmos.network/v0.44/building-modules/intro.html)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration
[tests](https://github.com/desmos-labs/desmos/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go
code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable
and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected
items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type
prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json)
in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants