-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: Update max delay for NodeClaim lifecycle controller #1773
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hi @edibble21. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ func (c *Controller) Register(_ context.Context, m manager.Manager) error { | |||
WithOptions(controller.Options{ | |||
RateLimiter: workqueue.NewTypedMaxOfRateLimiter[reconcile.Request]( | |||
// back off until last attempt occurs ~90 seconds before nodeclaim expiration | |||
workqueue.NewTypedItemExponentialFailureRateLimiter[reconcile.Request](time.Second, 300*time.Second), | |||
workqueue.NewTypedItemExponentialFailureRateLimiter[reconcile.Request](time.Second, time.Minute), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rschalo Can you take a look at this change? I recall that we made this change for a reason but I know you had the most context on why we originally made this change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this needs to be updated so that CI passes, but overall it looks good
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: edibble21, jonathan-innis The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
Fixes #N/A
Description
Updated max delay in Nodeclaim lifecycle counter
How was this change tested?
make presubmit
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.