Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[launcher] Add privileged launch policy #526

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alexmwu
Copy link
Contributor

@alexmwu alexmwu commented Jan 8, 2025

Privileged mode as a launch policy option allows workload authors to specify whether they want the operator to grant more privileged capabilities. It is a coarse launch policy, so workload authors need to take care when setting it.

Privileged mode currently applies to allowing a namespaced rw cgroup mount and adding new Linux capabilities.

@alexmwu
Copy link
Contributor Author

alexmwu commented Jan 8, 2025

/gcbrun

@alexmwu alexmwu marked this pull request as draft January 8, 2025 21:43
@alexmwu alexmwu force-pushed the privileged branch 2 times, most recently from 0a682aa to d6afb76 Compare January 8, 2025 21:45
@alexmwu
Copy link
Contributor Author

alexmwu commented Jan 8, 2025

/gcbrun

@alexmwu alexmwu force-pushed the privileged branch 6 times, most recently from f440b5b to 9a2541e Compare January 8, 2025 22:38
@alexmwu
Copy link
Contributor Author

alexmwu commented Jan 8, 2025

/gcbrun

Privileged mode as a launch policy option allows workload authors to
specify whether they want the operator to grant more privileged
capabilities. It is a coarse launch policy, so workload authors need to
take care when setting it.

Privileged mode currently applies to allowing a namespaced rw cgroup
mount and adding new Linux capabilities.
@alexmwu
Copy link
Contributor Author

alexmwu commented Jan 8, 2025

/gcbrun

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant