Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

makepkg-git-i686: accommodate for gettext v0.23.* #92

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dscho
Copy link
Member

@dscho dscho commented Jan 17, 2025

As of v0.23, the msgfmt.exe program depends on a newly-introduced library, gettext-libtextstyle. In #90, we included that in minimal SDK's sparse checkout, too.

But we forgot to update the makepkg-git sparse definition for building the i686 variant of mingw-w64-git. This did not cause problems during the v2.48.0-rc phase so far because the git-artifacts workflow builds the i686 variant in the i686 Git SDK.

However, the Azure Pipeline that builds the snapshots (and which I haven't found time to migrate to GitHub Actions in the past two years) still used the x86_64 Git SDK to build the i686 variant of mingw-w64-git, and there things fell apart.

So let's fix this.

In the long run, we will want to stop building i686 packages in the x86_64 Git SDK altogether.

As of v0.23, the `msgfmt.exe` program depends on a newly-introduced
library, gettext-libtextstyle. In e70ecb7 (minimal-sdk: accommodate
for gettext v0.23.*, 2025-01-07), we included that in minimal SDK's
sparse checkout, too.

But we forgot to update the `makepkg-git` sparse definition for building
the i686 variant of `mingw-w64-git`. This did not cause problems during
the v2.48.0-rc phase so far because the `git-artifacts` workflow builds
the i686 variant in the i686 Git SDK.

However, the Azure Pipeline that builds the snapshots (and which I
haven't found time to migrate to GitHub Actions in the past two years)
still used the x86_64 Git SDK to build the i686 variant of
`mingw-w64-git`, and there things fell apart.

So let's fix this.

In the long run, we will want to stop building i686 packages in the
x86_64 Git SDK altogether.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]>
@dscho dscho self-assigned this Jan 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant