Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Working TCP in example packetdumper #59

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 20, 2024
Merged

Working TCP in example packetdumper #59

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

compscidr
Copy link
Owner

  • disabled logging for speedup
  • disabled showing any info about dumps in UI for speedup

@compscidr compscidr changed the title Working TCP in packetdumper Working TCP in example packetdumper Nov 20, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.11%. Comparing base (b01736a) to head (4740b31).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main      #59   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     79.11%   79.11%           
  Complexity       88       88           
=========================================
  Files            19       19           
  Lines           541      541           
  Branches         64       64           
=========================================
  Hits            428      428           
  Misses           75       75           
  Partials         38       38           
Flag Coverage Δ
libunittests 79.11% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@compscidr compscidr merged commit f489dc6 into main Nov 20, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant