-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Implement UNION ALL BY NAME #14538
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
NULL 3 | ||
5 NULL | ||
|
||
# TODO: This should pass, but the sanity checker isn't allowing it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few of the UNION ALL BY NAME
tests are failing during the sanity checker. Not completely sure why atm 🤔
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@ | |||
# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Most tests here were taken from DuckDB's SLT suite!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
DuckDB to the best of my knowledge is NOT Apache licensed.. Any code or tests taken from them should be licensed appropriately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for catching that @Omega359. Can I include the notice there in conjunction with this header?
FYI @berkaysynnada and @berkaysynnada |
I ran the sqlite sqllogictests against your branch and it passed so none of those files covered union (all) by name |
Which issue does this PR close?
What changes are included in this PR?
UNION [ALL | DISTINCT] BY NAME implementation and associated tests
Are these changes tested?
Yes
Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes, no breaking changes, but new functionality.