Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement UNION ALL BY NAME #14508

Open
Tracked by #14514
berkaysynnada opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #14538
Open
Tracked by #14514

Implement UNION ALL BY NAME #14508

berkaysynnada opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #14538
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@berkaysynnada
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?

Users may need to combine tables with differing column orders or missing columns as evolving schemas. Currently, AFAIK we require columns to match by position, forcing manual schema adjustments.

Describe the solution you'd like

Implement a UNION ALL BY NAME operator or modify the existing one such that it:

  • matches columns by name rather than by position.
  • fills missing columns with NULLs.
  • optionally supports similar flexibility in INSERT operations (e.g., INSERT INTO ... BY NAME).

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@Omega359
Copy link
Contributor

Omega359 commented Feb 5, 2025

#12650

@rkrishn7
Copy link
Contributor

rkrishn7 commented Feb 6, 2025

take

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants