Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: ClientResponse class support methods iter_chunked and iter_chunks. #7455

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fatelei
Copy link

@fatelei fatelei commented Jul 30, 2023

What do these changes do?

ClientResponse class support methods iter_chunked and iter_chunks.

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

  • use high level iter_chunked and iter_chunks for tracing

Related issue number

#5324

Checklist

  • I think the code is well written
  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Documentation reflects the changes
  • If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
    • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
    • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
  • Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES folder
    • name it <issue_id>.<type> for example (588.bugfix)
    • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the pr
    • ensure type is one of the following:
      • .feature: Signifying a new feature.
      • .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix.
      • .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement.
      • .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
      • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
    • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."

@psf-chronographer psf-chronographer bot added the bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR label Jul 30, 2023
@Dreamsorcerer
Copy link
Member

Ideally, we'd want to avoid having 2 methods for the same thing. When we have time, we'll try to see if there's a way to put tracing into the existing method.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants