Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Explicitly spec out how non-k-anon auction works. #1080
Explicitly spec out how non-k-anon auction works. #1080
Changes from 2 commits
7148d90
740a93d
5b6b0c1
c5404fc
e7263f9
1030d77
9340c7d
da739c3
5a5f96d
c021fb7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe "copy" -> "clone".
@domfarolino Is there a [=clone=] to link to for struct? I saw lists/sets/maps have one, but didn't find one for struct .
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah infra doesn't seem to have a definition for this and it probably should. Could you use the word "clone" manually, and then file a bug against the Infra Standard?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
filed: whatwg/infra#634
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, might need to register the original generatedBid for debugging if this one is a failure to get the reject reason = below threshold stuff out?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Though this appears that it may only work for PA, not for forDebuggingOnly?
https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:content/browser/interest_group/interest_group_auction.cc;drc=3afa53375890e7144673d8e9e6356868295c2873;l=490
... which may make my pull request to the explainer a bit off :(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, seems like a bug, that we may want to report this k-anon reject reason to forDebuggingOnly as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, probably. And I think my next refactors of this make us better suited for speccing it, so maybe don't need to worry about this for a moment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we link "update k-anonymity counts" to an algorithm, maybe [=Increment a winning bid's k-anonymity count=]?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the syntax for linking to an algorithm with text that's not just its name?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://speced.github.io/bikeshed/#changing-lt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Dominic; done. (Though maybe I will want to tweak the name further)