Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] flatjson read notObject json crash #55661

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Seaven
Copy link
Contributor

@Seaven Seaven commented Feb 7, 2025

Why I'm doing:

What I'm doing:

like insert into js8 values (11, parse_json('1985-07-10 01:35:29'));
the remain json will be '1985-07-10 01:35:29', not object, need special process

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.4
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0

@Seaven Seaven requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2025 07:49
@mergify mergify bot assigned Seaven Feb 7, 2025
builder.close();
auto slice = builder.slice();
_json_result->append(JsonValue(slice));
_null_result->append(slice.isEmptyObject());
}
} else {
for (size_t i = 0; i < rows; i++) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The most risky bug in this code is:
Potential use of nullptr when calling obj->to_vslice() without checking if obj is not null.

You can modify the code like this:

auto obj = remain->get_object(i);
if (!obj) {
    // Handle null object appropriately
    _json_result->append(JsonValue()); // Or any other handling mechanism
    _null_result->append(true); // Assuming null should be treated as empty
    continue;
}
auto vs = obj->to_vslice();
if (obj->is_invalid()) {
    vpack::Builder builder;
    builder.add(vpack::Value(vpack::ValueType::Object));
    _merge_json(_src_root.get(), &builder, i);
    builder.close();
    auto slice = builder.slice();
    _json_result->append(JsonValue(slice));
    _null_result->append(slice.isEmptyObject());
} else if (!vs.isObject()) {
    for (int k = 0; k < _src_paths.size(); k++) {
        // check child column should be null
        DCHECK(_src_columns[k]->is_null(i));
    }
    _json_result->append(JsonValue(vs));
    _null_result->append(vs.isEmptyObject());
} else {
    vpack::Builder builder;
    builder.add(vpack::Value(vpack::ValueType::Object));
    _merge_json_with_remain<IN_TREE>(_src_root.get(), &vs, &builder, i);
    builder.close();
    auto slice = builder.slice();
    _json_result->append(JsonValue(slice));
    _null_result->append(slice.isEmptyObject());
}

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant