Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new RelationshipType's and FactType's for Associations #76

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dnash21e
Copy link
Contributor

@dnash21e dnash21e commented Dec 8, 2020

No description provided.

@dnash21e
Copy link
Contributor Author

dnash21e commented Dec 8, 2020

#76 I’m sure there will need to be some updates. I added the 2 new ones Todd P had talked about Friend and Relative, but not sure about the actual TF naming.

@@ -31,6 +31,19 @@ public void testIt() {
testType("http://familysearch.org/v1/TitleOfNobility", FamilySearchFactType.TitleOfNobility);
testType("http://familysearch.org/v1/TribeName", FamilySearchFactType.TribeName);

// association fact types
//testType("http://familysearch.org/v1/Apprenticeship", FamilySearchFactType.Apprenticeship); // exists as a core Gedcomx FactType
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One issue here is for TF the Apprenticeship fact type is in the familysearch namespace
But it is in core Gedcomx and I believe that will use http://gedcomx.org/Apprenticeship

Copy link
Member

@stoicflame stoicflame left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I'm good with the changes as proposed here.

When this gets merged, I'd like to update the spec for at least the new relationship types.

@dnash21e dnash21e force-pushed the AssociationRelationships branch 4 times, most recently from 7ee7b0d to a59705c Compare January 26, 2021 21:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants