-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 273
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor Structure #757
Comments
Please note that any hardware changes requires FIRST approval beforehand. |
WDYM "hardware changes"? |
I'm adding some stuff from other issues into the checklist, as they are relevant |
Any hardware article additions or major changes need FIRST approval. |
I'm starting to work on some of the smaller changes above, and submit a PR for each one. If there are some issues that are problematic/should be handled differently, please let me know before I spend too much time on them. |
What software components are relevant only to LV, or not relevant to LV at all? |
Basically. |
LV Dashboard is interopable with C++/Java robot code and smartdashboard/shuffleboard work with LabVIEW robot. They are not the most common, but are supported (my team ran LabVIEW dashboard with Java robot for several years). |
So how do you propose we divide the components? Or perhaps all dashboards should be split into a separate article? |
I've been a big fan of per-topic structure for a long time. |
I think this issue should probably be closed in favor of a bunch of the other restructure issues that are more up to date. |
Discussion of changes got a bit off-topic in #726 and went to general changes that are not directly connected to the "Getting Started" rewrite. So the discussion of article refactoring can be done here. I'll start a checklist of changes/refactorings that should be done, and any additions are welcome - add a comment and me or one of the maintainers (probably @Daltz333) will add it to the checklist.
Some topics that need articles written, and structure is relevant (note that some of these have their own GH issues):
As there are many issues with the "FRC Software Component Overview" article. Each tool should be split somewhere else. Some work is being done for this in #604. Here's a quick overview of my suggestions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: