Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Val loss always lower than train loss #11

Open
czarmanu opened this issue Oct 31, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Val loss always lower than train loss #11

czarmanu opened this issue Oct 31, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@czarmanu
Copy link

I tried 4 fold cross validation on the Processed patches

In all 4 folds, val loss is almost always lower than than train loss, which is weird. (I used 60% in train set and 40% in val set). The result was ths same when i used 90,10 split too.

But, the val accuracy is always less than train accuracy which makes sense.
Why is the val loss always lower than the train loss in all the folds?###

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant