Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider using alternatives to standard library types #536

Open
SamVanheer opened this issue Oct 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Consider using alternatives to standard library types #536

SamVanheer opened this issue Oct 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@SamVanheer
Copy link
Collaborator

SamVanheer commented Oct 5, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Consider using alternatives the C++ standard library types.

The following types are known to have performance issues that can be avoided using replacements:

Type Alternative
unordered_map See this benchmark for a starting point: https://martin.ankerl.com/2022/08/27/hashmap-bench-01/#benchmark-results-table
regex Boost.Regex

Make sure to test changes to ensure correctness.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Potential Upgrades
Status: To do
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@SamVanheer