Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-evaluate dependencies #839

Open
colinodell opened this issue Mar 24, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Re-evaluate dependencies #839

colinodell opened this issue Mar 24, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
do not close Issue which won't close due to inactivity
Milestone

Comments

@colinodell
Copy link
Member

I really liked how v1 had no external dependencies. In v2 we opted to pull in some dependencies instead of reinventing the wheel. I think this was a good decision, but do we truly need everything in that dependency tree? Maybe yes, maybe no. Let's explore if it's reasonable to reduce that footprint in any ways that don't negatively impact users or maintainers. (We don't want to just remove things for the sake of removing things). This way involve some major-version-level changes to league/config as well.

We'll either confirm that we have exactly what we want/need, or we'll find areas to make small improvements.

@colinodell colinodell added the do not close Issue which won't close due to inactivity label Mar 24, 2022
@colinodell colinodell added this to the v3.0 milestone Mar 24, 2022
@colinodell colinodell self-assigned this Mar 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do not close Issue which won't close due to inactivity
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant