Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Simplify caching of large dicts, such as ngram_in_title #5

Open
dodijk opened this issue Mar 28, 2013 · 1 comment
Open

Simplify caching of large dicts, such as ngram_in_title #5

dodijk opened this issue Mar 28, 2013 · 1 comment
Assignees
@dodijk
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@dodijk
Copy link
Contributor

dodijk commented Mar 28, 2013

For this I would like to use JobLib's memory cache, instead of the pickle functions we use now.
@ghost ghost assigned dodijk Mar 28, 2013
@evertlammerts
Copy link
Contributor

Is this still necessary now that we support multiple backends? Development can always be done against a fast-loading backend (right now, redis) and in production we don't really need caching, I guess?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dodijk dodijk

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@dodijk @evertlammerts