Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: Citizen #384

Open
tompace opened this issue Feb 10, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Suggestion: Citizen #384

tompace opened this issue Feb 10, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers; please defer these issues if you're not a first-time contributor help wanted Good for external contributors Type · Definitions Relates to specific definitions

Comments

@tompace
Copy link

tompace commented Feb 10, 2021

  • "Citizen" - it is not inclusive language and is often used instead of Community Member, member of community, or resident.
@tatianamac tatianamac added good first issue Good for newcomers; please defer these issues if you're not a first-time contributor help wanted Good for external contributors Type · Definitions Relates to specific definitions labels Feb 24, 2021
@tatianamac
Copy link
Collaborator

@tompace Would you feel comfortable with either [1] drafting a definition of a word or [2] reading a draft as an editor?

@streamerd
Copy link

streamerd commented Jan 6, 2022

hey @tompace it's really good point.

I'll support residency for a couple of reasons for a general shift on that;
but as-is citizenship, is aligning with community membership much better.
please find my reasoning below:

semantically, term includes other livings as well.
however membership is consciously made, willing action.

on the other hand, community membership is not bound to locality,
yet residency and citizenship, have that notion.

In fact, membership in a community is more like citizenship as-is,
that can be sustained remotely, physical or moral detachment from that land is somehow not welcomed.

that's why citizenship and being member in a community resonates much better.

residency is more dependent to locality.
upon a migration to another city/country, that status is changed.

people are mostly no longer kept registered to where they came from.
( we have entered to an era, with people living in multiple cities though .. multi-residency )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVPLqbWXdDA

currently, de-facto, there exists a global socio-bureaucratic cast system:

which goes like:
citizen > resident > tourist > ...

this is fucked up. all people are legal and equal.
all stuff is happening because that one particular reality, is never acknowledged as base of equality.

everyone's one second of life, is equally valuable.

states are currently, an abstraction that isolate people.

citizenship, as-is a "certification of isolation"

  • on the other hand, how about world citizenship ?
    to me, that doesn't sound that bad on that context, but feels like world residency beats that, also sounding more futuristic.

the term residency, is more likely succeed in including other livings too.

my opinion is citizenship is more alike to community membership.
// both sustain and exist based rules/ constitutions widely accepted or propagated, regardless of locality and their formation, with relative constants and dynamics.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers; please defer these issues if you're not a first-time contributor help wanted Good for external contributors Type · Definitions Relates to specific definitions
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants