You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now only Toffoli gates are taken into account for the estimation of time and physical qubits required to synthesize non-Clifford gates in the circuit.
Produce best cost in terms of physical qubits and real run time based on
number of toffoli, number of logical qubits, and physical error rate.
"""
From a Toffoli gate, 2 T gates might be obtained (https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2019-04-30-135/pdf/). However, the cost is not exactly 1->2 as the conversion takes time etc. I think adding T gates would be a great idea, in part because T gates are more natural when it comes to rotations, even if it seems that all state-of-the-art methods heavily rely on Toffolis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now only Toffoli gates are taken into account for the estimation of time and physical qubits required to synthesize non-Clifford gates in the circuit.
OpenFermion/src/openfermion/resource_estimates/surface_code_compilation/physical_costing.py
Lines 176 to 184 in cf53c06
From a Toffoli gate, 2 T gates might be obtained (https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2019-04-30-135/pdf/). However, the cost is not exactly 1->2 as the conversion takes time etc. I think adding T gates would be a great idea, in part because T gates are more natural when it comes to rotations, even if it seems that all state-of-the-art methods heavily rely on Toffolis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: