-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document Ingress controller requirements and alternatives #88
Comments
I have it working with ingress-nginx running the console ingress, and a service type: LoadBalancer for the rest of it. I understand that this might be less advisable than having a proxy in front of the relay though. I failed to get ssl-passthrough on ingress-nginx working (it requires you to put an enablement flag on the controller, which I did, but despite my attempts it was still proxying). Would it be possible to get paralus to use the cert-manager generated certificate for *.user and *.core-connector? |
True. However in some cases it would be feasible to use without any third-party proxy for example, local testing.
Setting ssl passthrough annotation to ingress resource and enabling ssl passthrough at ingress-nginx controller should have worked.. I have seen many folks go for ingress-nginx so above configuration works let us know so we could document it.
Possibly. Need to check though. |
I would say ingress-nginx is way more popular than contour, and most of the users would prefer it. I decided to try Paralus with ingress-nginx and failed. |
Currently Paralus by default installs Contour controller and manages routes using HTTPProxy resources.
It would be good to document the followings:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: