You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi again,
I wanted to submit another issue since I have a question pertaining to a different notebook. 'Eythroid_others.ipynb' .
I'm getting very different results when performing the trajectory inference using VeloVI on Erythroid data.
I've been following it step by step and the inference worked as expected via Slingshot and DPT.
This is what I'm seeing:
In contrast, in the github, the cells result in this output:
I didn't do anything additional to adata and the code is exactly the same, so am wondering why there is such a huge discrepancy on the number of genes being filtered out.
This is causing a very different trajectory model and very different RMSE and velocity map.
I'm using scVelo version: 0.3.3 and scanpy version: 1.10.4.
Have you encountered this issue before? Please advise!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi again,
I wanted to submit another issue since I have a question pertaining to a different notebook. 'Eythroid_others.ipynb' .
I'm getting very different results when performing the trajectory inference using VeloVI on Erythroid data.
I've been following it step by step and the inference worked as expected via Slingshot and DPT.
This is what I'm seeing:
In contrast, in the github, the cells result in this output:
I didn't do anything additional to adata and the code is exactly the same, so am wondering why there is such a huge discrepancy on the number of genes being filtered out.
This is causing a very different trajectory model and very different RMSE and velocity map.
I'm using scVelo version: 0.3.3 and scanpy version: 1.10.4.
Have you encountered this issue before? Please advise!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: