Field concatenation or replication? #217
Unanswered
trailbound
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
The SystemRDL spec appears to support concatenation and replication operators just as Verilog does, but I'm having trouble getting it to work in PeakRDL Regblock. Am I missing some key to making this work? I have a single bit field which I'm trying to use as a mask on a wider bit field.
I also tried concatenation...
Both lead to the following error.
I've been trying to determine if there is a way I need to explicitly set the feature.enable field as an integral type, but I thought it would be integral (bit/logic) by default? If anyone has any insight, I'd be grateful!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions