Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistent EDR parameter metadata for NWP #591

Open
chris-little opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Consistent EDR parameter metadata for NWP #591

chris-little opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
best practice issues to be added to the best practice Cross-SWG Discussion documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@chris-little
Copy link
Contributor

chris-little commented Jan 14, 2025

@ShaneMill1
In our work so far, we typically have used cfgrib to defined the parameter metadata because that is the default GRIB decoder for Xarray. However, some NWS data uses local GRIB2 tables to define some of these attributes which causes cfgrib to read the parameter name as "unknown". For that case, we have used either GDAL or Rasterio to define the parameter metadata, or a new tool developed by MDL called Grib2io because those tools contain the NWS parameters.

Each of these tools handle the parameter names a little differently. I personally like how cfgrib handles the metadata (being based on eccodes), but I have yet to figure out how to add the local tables to cfgrib to get it to work with all NWS data.

--

@tomkralidis
We are setting up our public pygeoapi EDR and Zarr production. How are you defining parameter metadata? id’s, names etc. I would like some consistency if possible between NWP EDRs. We should discuss with RODEO EDR folks as well.

--

@chris-little chris-little added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Cross-SWG Discussion best practice issues to be added to the best practice labels Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
best practice issues to be added to the best practice Cross-SWG Discussion documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant