You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While looking at the coding in samm.f90, I noticed that the IFG flag (which defines whether or not the widths need to be interpreted as reduced widths or not) is never checked. A simple test has shown that the flag is never checked so evaluations with reduced widths will be treated as if the widths in the resonance parameters are normal widths. As far as I know, no evaluations use reduced widths (but still, the day some evaluation does, we are in trouble).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While looking at the coding in samm.f90, I noticed that the IFG flag (which defines whether or not the widths need to be interpreted as reduced widths or not) is never checked. A simple test has shown that the flag is never checked so evaluations with reduced widths will be treated as if the widths in the resonance parameters are normal widths. As far as I know, no evaluations use reduced widths (but still, the day some evaluation does, we are in trouble).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: