Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Execute workflow node, ignore defined inputs in production #12952

Open
melchione opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Execute workflow node, ignore defined inputs in production #12952

melchione opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
in linear Issue or PR has been created in Linear for internal review

Comments

@melchione
Copy link

Bug Description

Hi all, I have 2 differents behaviour in edit mode and in production mode.

I have this simple workflow to reproduce the issue :
Image

The subworkflow has tome inputs defined so as to work with them.

Image

And I pass theme from my main workflow :

Image

IMPORTANT: there is a node between my sub workflow and the source from where I retrieve the datas I pass.

In EDIT mode :
The dats are correctly sent to the subworkflow.

In production:
It does not care about the inputs I defined and their values, instead it takes the data returned by the previous node (here y set node).

The quick fix (but very enoyong), si to insert a set with the formated data before each sub workflow. But I think it's a bug becose it works correctly in edit mode.

PS: I don't know the node version, I'm using the docker hub version n railway.

To Reproduce

My main workflow :
main_workflow.json

The sub workflow :
sub_workflow.json

Expected behavior

The expected behavior is for the sub workflow to get the inputs defined instead of always the datas returned by the prevous node.
To behave like the edit mode.

Operating System

Ubuntu

n8n Version

1.76.1

Node.js Version

no idea

Database

PostgreSQL

Execution mode

queue

@Joffcom
Copy link
Member

Joffcom commented Jan 30, 2025

Hey @melchione,

We have created an internal ticket to look into this which we will be tracking as "GHC-673"

@Joffcom Joffcom added the in linear Issue or PR has been created in Linear for internal review label Jan 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in linear Issue or PR has been created in Linear for internal review
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants