You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As an n8n user, I've successfully implemented workflows that integrate with Telegram via the Telegram node. These workflows power three different AI-driven projects that I rely on daily. While the integration generally works well, I've encountered a recurring issue that's challenging the reliability of my system.
The problem is specific and perplexing: one of my Telegram nodes occasionally stops functioning after several days or weeks of flawless operation. The other Telegram nodes for my other projects continue to run without any problems. When this issue occurs, I’ve found that simply deactivating and reactivating the affected workflow resolves it immediately. However, this workaround isn’t ideal for a production-grade setup, especially when delivering solutions to real clients.
Here are some key observations about this issue:
Scope of the Problem: Only one Telegram node fails at a time, and the failure occurs sporadically without a clear pattern.
Reliability Elsewhere: The rest of the Telegram nodes and other input mechanisms, such as the Chat node, operate reliably for weeks or even months.
Temporary Fix: Deactivating and reactivating the affected workflow resolves the issue instantly, but this manual intervention is not sustainable for professional use.
I've considered implementing an automated script to periodically deactivate and reactivate the workflows as a stopgap solution. However, this feels like a band-aid rather than a proper fix. I suspect there may be a deeper issue with the Telegram node’s connection or session handling.
My Questions for the Community:
Have you experienced similar intermittent failures with the Telegram node in n8n?
What strategies have you used to maintain long-term reliability for Telegram integrations?
Is there a known root cause or fix for this type of issue?
Are there alternative ways to monitor and handle workflow failures more gracefully within n8n?
This problem is critical for me, as I plan to scale these AI-driven Telegram bots for clients. Any insights, advice, or shared experiences from fellow n8n users would be greatly appreciated. Let’s collaborate to make n8n even more robust for production-grade use cases!
I am using the cloud hosted version.
core
n8nVersion: 1.75.2
platform: npm
nodeJsVersion: 20.18.1
database: sqlite
executionMode: regular
concurrency: 5
license: community
storage
success: all
error: all
progress: false
manual: true
binaryMode: filesystem
pruning
enabled: true
maxAge: 168 hours
maxCount: 2500 executions
client
userAgent: mozilla/5.0 (x11; linux x86_64) applewebkit/537.36 (khtml, like gecko) chrome/132.0.0.0 safari/537.36
isTouchDevice: false
Generated at: 2025-01-29T20:15:56.954Z}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You can find our community on our forum and on Discord, We use GitHub issues just for tracking bugs.
One thing to remember with Telegram is that each bot can only have one webhook registered, one of the problems I have seen is users testing an active workflow which causes the webhook url to be overwritten in Telegram and often needs the workflow to be deactivated and activated again so it registers. Is it possible that this is what you are seeing?
As an n8n user, I've successfully implemented workflows that integrate with Telegram via the Telegram node. These workflows power three different AI-driven projects that I rely on daily. While the integration generally works well, I've encountered a recurring issue that's challenging the reliability of my system.
The problem is specific and perplexing: one of my Telegram nodes occasionally stops functioning after several days or weeks of flawless operation. The other Telegram nodes for my other projects continue to run without any problems. When this issue occurs, I’ve found that simply deactivating and reactivating the affected workflow resolves it immediately. However, this workaround isn’t ideal for a production-grade setup, especially when delivering solutions to real clients.
Here are some key observations about this issue:
Scope of the Problem: Only one Telegram node fails at a time, and the failure occurs sporadically without a clear pattern.
Reliability Elsewhere: The rest of the Telegram nodes and other input mechanisms, such as the Chat node, operate reliably for weeks or even months.
Temporary Fix: Deactivating and reactivating the affected workflow resolves the issue instantly, but this manual intervention is not sustainable for professional use.
I've considered implementing an automated script to periodically deactivate and reactivate the workflows as a stopgap solution. However, this feels like a band-aid rather than a proper fix. I suspect there may be a deeper issue with the Telegram node’s connection or session handling.
My Questions for the Community:
Have you experienced similar intermittent failures with the Telegram node in n8n?
What strategies have you used to maintain long-term reliability for Telegram integrations?
Is there a known root cause or fix for this type of issue?
Are there alternative ways to monitor and handle workflow failures more gracefully within n8n?
This problem is critical for me, as I plan to scale these AI-driven Telegram bots for clients. Any insights, advice, or shared experiences from fellow n8n users would be greatly appreciated. Let’s collaborate to make n8n even more robust for production-grade use cases!
I am using the cloud hosted version.
core
storage
pruning
client
Generated at: 2025-01-29T20:15:56.954Z}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: