Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

metal llama.cpp performs much worse than LM Studio MLX? #171

Open
xuhengdada opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

metal llama.cpp performs much worse than LM Studio MLX? #171

xuhengdada opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@xuhengdada
Copy link

When using similar models, for example, using metal llama.cpp running DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B (Q4_K_M) GGUF, and LM Studio MLX running DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B (4bit) MLX, the later case (~8-9 tokens/s) is 2x faster than former (~3-4tokens/s). So I wander why is that?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant