You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Surely the only differentiator between snippets should be 4.0, 4.1, 4.2 etc. It would be simpler if submissions we tagged with the current version. When a new version is released all members with submissions are emailed; asking them to review and update/delete outdated snippets or face automatic deletion within 1 month.
There is a risk that content will get deleted even though it is valid. But it will ensure that all content is 1) carefully reviewed, 2) current and 3) maintained. Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Furthermore: I would be happy to spend some time reviewing these "old" snippets and conforming them to a new version. I think snippet's greatest strength is curation. I'm happy to spend time/effort for that to continue. Let's be the App Store of Laravel 4 code, not the Play Store... :)
Should L3 snippets be accepted?
Surely the only differentiator between snippets should be 4.0, 4.1, 4.2 etc. It would be simpler if submissions we tagged with the current version. When a new version is released all members with submissions are emailed; asking them to review and update/delete outdated snippets or face automatic deletion within 1 month.
There is a risk that content will get deleted even though it is valid. But it will ensure that all content is 1) carefully reviewed, 2) current and 3) maintained. Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: