You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
No long ago, I made co-maintainer of hg-git, and have been doing my best since then to keep the project alive. I was wondering if you'd be willing to transfer ownership of the organisation, and perhaps the old repository as well, to either me or one of the other maintainers, such as @gracinet?
I'm currently maintaining a mirror of the active upstream at danchr/hg-git. Currently, master is a measly 445 commits of schacon/hg-git 🙂 Although Heptapod is the canonical upstream for hg-git, and should remain so for the foreseeable future, it would be great to have an “official” presence on Github as well.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
+1. It would be extremely helpful to have hg-git website and organization pointing to the actively maintained upstream. Took me several hours to track down why hg-git was not working on my new machine, only to discover it was a protocol change in the dulwich library.
No long ago, I made co-maintainer of hg-git, and have been doing my best since then to keep the project alive. I was wondering if you'd be willing to transfer ownership of the organisation, and perhaps the old repository as well, to either me or one of the other maintainers, such as @gracinet?
I'm currently maintaining a mirror of the active upstream at danchr/hg-git. Currently,
master
is a measly 445 commits of schacon/hg-git 🙂 Although Heptapod is the canonical upstream for hg-git, and should remain so for the foreseeable future, it would be great to have an “official” presence on Github as well.Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: