Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Capsules #118

Closed
kavonszadkowski opened this issue Aug 30, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Capsules #118

kavonszadkowski opened this issue Aug 30, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
feature New feature proposal/idea for Phobos.

Comments

@kavonszadkowski
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently, capsules for collision objects or visual objects are not supported by URDF and dealing with them is thus a bit problematic. However, there is some discussion to add them to URDF at some point, and they might at least end up in the successor of URDF.

Also, Blender allows to add them using its Extra Objects add-on, which would have to be activated from within Phobos.

I propose to solve this issue by simply adding capsules as a geometry type and add an operator that allows to transform them into two cylinders and two spheres for URDF compatibility. Object properties such as simulation friction or collision settings etc. would have to be copied to all new objects.

@Amudtogal Amudtogal added this to the Phobos 1.0 milestone Jul 4, 2018
@Amudtogal
Copy link
Collaborator

Instead of replacing the capsules by other meshes, we could just calculate the output for sphere and cylinder on the fly, similar to the new Mesh Inertia Calculation (#146).

SDF does not handle capsules either. So we best, make this a util function.
We could even make this a generic tool, so users can replace more complex shapes (which are used alot) with their on configuration?

@Amudtogal Amudtogal added the feature New feature proposal/idea for Phobos. label Sep 3, 2018
@AlCap23
Copy link
Collaborator

AlCap23 commented Jan 28, 2019

Pushed to 1.1 .

Could be done via Principle Component Analysis of the point cloud.

@AlCap23 AlCap23 modified the milestones: Phobos 1.0, Phobos 1.1 Jan 28, 2019
@Amudtogal Amudtogal modified the milestones: Phobos 1.0.1, Phobos 1.0.2 Jan 12, 2020
@hwiedPro hwiedPro removed this from the Phobos 1.0.2 milestone Jan 27, 2023
@hwiedPro hwiedPro added wontfix Feature/Bug won't be fixed for Phobos. and removed wontfix Feature/Bug won't be fixed for Phobos. labels Jan 27, 2023
@dfki-ric dfki-ric locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 15, 2023
@hwiedPro hwiedPro converted this issue into discussion #294 Jun 15, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
feature New feature proposal/idea for Phobos.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants