Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dependency step installs roles to user's roles path, not in ephemeral directory #4109

Open
7 tasks done
tierpod opened this issue Dec 29, 2023 · 3 comments
Open
7 tasks done
Assignees

Comments

@tierpod
Copy link

tierpod commented Dec 29, 2023

Prerequisites

  • This was not already reported in the past (duplicate check)
  • It does reproduce it with code from main branch (latest unreleased version)
  • I include a minimal example for reproducing the bug
  • The bug is not trivial, as for those a direct pull-request is preferred
  • Running pip check does not report any conflicts
  • I was able to reproduce the issue on a different machine
  • The issue is not specific to any driver other than 'default' one

Environment

molecule 6.0.3 using python 3.11 
    ansible:2.16.2
    azure:23.5.0 from molecule_plugins
    containers:23.5.0 from molecule_plugins requiring collections: ansible.posix>=1.3.0 community.docker>=1.9.1 containers.podman>=1.8.1
    default:6.0.3 from molecule
    docker:23.5.0 from molecule_plugins requiring collections: community.docker>=3.0.2 ansible.posix>=1.4.0
    ec2:23.5.0 from molecule_plugins
    gce:23.5.0 from molecule_plugins requiring collections: google.cloud>=1.0.2 community.crypto>=1.8.0
    podman:23.5.0 from molecule_plugins requiring collections: containers.podman>=1.7.0 ansible.posix>=1.3.0
    vagrant:23.5.0 from molecule_plugins
Fedora release 38 (Thirty Eight)

What happened

Hello. After update from molecule 4 to molecule 6 I mentioned that molecule now tries to install dependencies into user's roles directory, not in ephemeral directory. I tried to investigate this problem by running molecule in debug mode, and I couldn't see any debug messages in output (ANSIBLE_* and MOLECULE_* environment variables):

molecule --debug -v dependency

INFO     Using /home/user/.ansible/roles/ansible-role-dotnet-tools symlink to current repository in order to enable Ansible to find the role using its expected full name.

I think it can be related to this PR #4047

Reproducing example

No response

@tierpod
Copy link
Author

tierpod commented Dec 29, 2023

molecule 5.1.0 looks OK:

molecule --debug -v dependency

INFO     Using /home/user/.cache/ansible-compat/fa9621/roles/ansible-role-dotnet-tools symlink to current repository in order to enable Ansible to find the role using its expected full name.

DEBUG: MOLECULE ENVIRONMENT:
...
MOLECULE_EPHEMERAL_DIRECTORY: /home/user/.cache/molecule/ansible-role-dotnet-tools/default
...

@isuftin
Copy link

isuftin commented Mar 21, 2024

Looks related to #4015

@isuftin
Copy link

isuftin commented May 24, 2024

While this issue still has not been fixed, what I've found is I am able to update the provisioner YAML in molecule.yml:

provisioner:
  name: ansible
  env:
    ANSIBLE_ROLES_PATH: $MOLECULE_EPHEMERAL_DIRECTORY/roles:${HOME}/.ansible/roles:/usr/share/ansible/roles:/etc/ansible/roles:$MOLECULE_PROJECT_DIRECTORY/roles

The last item in the list there $MOLECULE_PROJECT_DIRECTORY/roles adds the /roles dir in the role I'm testing to the ANSIBLE_ROLES_PATH. Because Molecule ends up installing roles into the project's /roles/ path, this allows Ansible to find the role during the run.

What's confusing is that according to Molecule's own docs @ https://ansible.readthedocs.io/projects/molecule/configuration/#molecule.provisioner.ansible.Ansible there's text that reads:

Environment variables. Molecule does its best to handle common Ansible paths. The defaults are as follows.

ANSIBLE_ROLES_PATH:
  $runtime_cache_dir/roles:$ephemeral_directory/roles/:$project_directory/../:~/.ansible/roles:/usr/share/ansible/roles:/etc/ansible/roles
ANSIBLE_LIBRARY:
  $ephemeral_directory/modules/:$project_directory/library/:~/.ansible/plugins/modules:/usr/share/ansible/plugins/modules
ANSIBLE_FILTER_PLUGINS:
  $ephemeral_directory/plugins/filter/:$project_directory/filter/plugins/:~/.ansible/plugins/filter:/usr/share/ansible/plugins/modules

However, when running Molecule without override ANSIBLE_ROLES_PATH, the default that Molecule seems to set is:

ANSIBLE_ROLES_PATH: /root/.cache/molecule/svc/aws-marketplace-rhel8-ec2/roles:/:/root/.ansible/roles:/usr/share/ansible/roles:/etc/ansible/roles

I am running Molecule in a Docker container with my role project in the /svc directory.

So it would seem what Molecule is setting is $MOLECULE_EPHEMERAL_DIRECTORY/roles:~/.ansible/roles:/usr/share/ansible/roles:/etc/ansible/roles

This differs from the docs in that it does not add $runtime_cache_dir/roles or $project_directory/../

I'm not even sure what $runtime_cache_dir refers to or what use $project_directory/../ would be?

In the end, instead of doing weird hacks like this, can we just go back to Molecule installing role dependencies for roles in the ~/.ansible/roles like it used to?

Edit: While I'm in here... two other things...

Installing 3rd party roles into a /roles subdirectory in your project also causes ansible-lint to lint those dependencies, which is not ideal. I end up having to ignore anything in /roles but requirements.yml in my .gitignore like:

roles/*
!roles/requirements.yml

And then ansible-lint will ignore dependencies as well as me/other devs not accidentally checking dependencies into the role project.

Second, if the role/ directory doesn't exist, Molecule will install the dependent role into the proper or ~/.ansible/roles location. But for us, as we use AWX/Ansible Tower/Ansible Automation Platform, when my role is part of a playbook, AWX will look to my role's roles/requirements.yml to pull down transitive dependencies for my role.

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ansible_automation_platform/2.4/html/automation_controller_user_guide/controller-projects#ref-projects-galaxy-support

afaik there's no other way to do this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants