Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize Operational Costs for Cross-Chain Swap Fillers via Reactor Contract Asset Management #216

Open
irnb opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@irnb
Copy link

irnb commented Jan 2, 2024

💡 Optimize Operational Costs for Cross-Chain Swap Fillers via Reactor Contract Asset Management

Description

📃 While reviewing the white paper's diagram related to cross-chain swaps, I noticed a potential improvement in the operational cost structure for fillers. Currently, fillers transfer bond assets each time they claim a new order and get it back after oracle message, incurring significant token transfer gas costs.

🚀 Proposal: I propose a modification where fillers maintain their assets within the Reactor contract and deposit bond to this contract or another contract to use it as bon credit. This approach allows fillers to utilize their credit in the Reactor contract for claiming new orders, eliminating the need for repetitive asset transfers and thus reducing the associated gas costs.

⚠️ Note: This suggestion is based on my understanding of the system as derived from the white paper's diagrams, and I haven't delved into the actual implementation details. This idea aims to streamline the process and decrease operational expenses for fillers involved in cross-chain swaps.

Screenshot 2024-01-02 at 10 25 41 AM

https://uniswap.org/whitepaper-uniswapx.pdf

@irnb
Copy link
Author

irnb commented Jan 2, 2024

filler specific bond pools

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant