-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
full code in simulation #45
Comments
Yes , You can use this in simulation or production , Even in sandbox |
Unfortunately i get
+"errorMessages": array:1 [ 0 => {#3201 +"type": "ERROR" +"code":
"signed-properties-hashing" +"category": "CERTIFICATE_ERRORS" +"message":
"Invalid signed properties hashing, SignedProperties with
id='xadesSignedProperties'" +"status": "ERROR" } ]
في أربعاء، 6 نوفمبر، 2024 في 11:31 ص، كتب Zaher Thaifani <
***@***.***>:
… Yes , You can use this in simulation or production , Even in sandbox
we support the three modes
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#45 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUGRNTQIUCBMPT6DYGAQEM3Z7HOVNAVCNFSM6AAAAABQVZ4O4OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINJZGEYTKMZZGE>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Hi @AhmedTarekYA Here are some important notes:
|
Any resolution i am also facing the same error. |
i too have same error |
The issue relates to signed properties, specifically that their hash value does not match its calculated value. This discrepancy happens due to the formatting of signed properties before hashing. |
Has anyone solved this issue? I'm facing the same error: Invalid signed properties hashing, SignedProperties with id='xadesSignedProperties'. Any help would be appreciated! |
Finally, I resolved this error by having 36 spaces in the first line and 4 spaces after that. This changes the hash ofthe signed property hash value does not match its calculated value. The signed properties hash is highly sensitive and can change with even a whitespace.
|
does any one finish the full integration code ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: