-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Responsive video posters #258
Comments
I think that if you're going to start supporting responsive video poster images, then you need to think about responsive video too. You can't make the images responsive and then ignore the videos. I would be all for using the good work done on picture and srcset to be also applied to video (and audio) by the way. |
@yoavweiss: I agree that supporting the srcset syntax works well. If we support w, are you just gonna assume that the size to resolve against is 100vw? If so, all right, but it seems a little weird. I'd rather support
@iandevlin Handling responsive video is interesting. Ideally we'd want to standardize automatic quality-switching, like what YouTube does. That's a pretty big task. I'm okay with biting off just what we can chew for now. ^_^ |
There is a standard already for automatic quality-switching video. It's called DASH. :) It's possible something more would be useful, but we should reason about it separately and look at its use cases and requirements, not just throw something in and hope the outcome will be good or hold I don't mind supporting srcset syntax in |
In httparchive, 1942 pages use |
Thanks for the data, @zcorpan! Looks like we'd be safe to upgrade in-place, then. |
Blink are shipping a syntax for poster images for plugins.
As part of that, a discussion developed regarding support for different form factors and different resolutions.
The folks there are keen on adopting the srcset syntax for the job, and I think it makes perfect sense.
A few questions remain:
w
descriptors? I believe it should.sizes
? In the current model where poster image are of lower priority, there's probably not a huge perf advantage in including it.<video poster>
?WDYT?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: