You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We found it confusing, that the glacier with smaller creep parameter advanced further after progressing the glacier to 500 years. We were wondering if we interpreted it incorrectly.
After having a look at the history, changing the progress to only 100 years and reading the summary below 'basal sliding', we understood the influence of the creep parameter.
We suggest to decrease the year to which the glaciers are processed to and/ or to add a text similar to the basal sliding for further information.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We found it confusing, that the glacier with smaller creep parameter advanced further after progressing the glacier to 500 years. We were wondering if we interpreted it incorrectly.
After having a look at the history, changing the progress to only 100 years and reading the summary below 'basal sliding', we understood the influence of the creep parameter.
We suggest to decrease the year to which the glaciers are processed to and/ or to add a text similar to the basal sliding for further information.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: