[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
The following document proposes an implementation of Synthetic Module Records (originally proposed by here by Domenic) in Chromium. Also proposed is an implementation of CSS Modules and JSON Modules using Synthetic Module Records. It is expected that Synthetic Module Record will be used to support additional future module types as well, e.g. WebIDL Modules.
At a high level, the changes are:
- Introduce a
SyntheticModule
type in V8 to implement Synthetic Module Records in the ES module graph. - Introduce the
ValueWrapperSyntheticModuleScript
type in Blink to support the creation of a Synthetic Module record that wraps a single value as the module's default export. - Enable
ModuleScriptLoader
to create CSS and JSON modules usingValueWrapperSyntheticModuleScript
.
Currently the v8::internal::Module class is V8's representation of a Source Text Module Record, which represents information about a Script Module such as its RequestedModules, its status ("uninstantiated", "instantiating", etc), and its imports/exports.
We will introduce two subclasses, JSModule
and SyntheticModule
. JSModule
will contain the functionality specific to JavaScript Modules that currently resides in Module
, and SyntheticModule
will contain the new Synthetic Module code. Common functionality will remain in Module
, which can now be considered as roughly equivalent to the spec's Abstract Module Record base type.
Since Struct
s in V8 don't allow VTables for performance reasons, Module
will contain the following new field to distinguish whether it is a JSModule
or SyntheticModule
:
DECL_INT_ACCESSORS(type)
enum Type {
kJS,
kSynthetic
};
All existing fields on Module
that are specific to JS or other Cyclic Module types will be pushed down to JSModule
. The following fields will be used for all module types and will therefore remain on Module
:
// The complete export table, mapping an export name to its cell.
// TODO(neis): We may want to remove the regular exports from the table.
DECL_ACCESSORS(exports, ObjectHashTable)
// Hash for this object (a random non-zero Smi).
DECL_INT_ACCESSORS(hash)
// Status.
DECL_INT_ACCESSORS(status)
// The namespace object (or undefined).
DECL_ACCESSORS(module_namespace, HeapObject)
SyntheticModule
will contain the following new fields in addition to those inherited from Module
:
// A list of all names exported by the module
DECL_ACCESSORS(export_names, FixedArray)
// A callback defined by the embedder that is executed upon evaluation of the module.
// QUESTION: evaluation_steps is just a function pointer to a Blink function. Is
// it optimal to store it as a Foreign or should we just stash the function pointer
// directly as a uintptr_t? Looking around the codebase I see some business about
// V8_COMPRESS_POINTERS that I'd rather not have to handle in the module code, and
// Foreign takes care of this for us.
DECL_ACCESSORS(evaluation_steps, Foreign)
SyntheticModule
will implement the following methods:
static void SetExport(
Isolate* isolate, Handle<SyntheticModule> module,
Handle<String> export_name,
Handle<Object> export_value);
static V8_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT MaybeHandle<Cell> ResolveExport(
Isolate* isolate, Handle<SyntheticModule> module,
Handle<String> module_specifier, Handle<String> export_name,
MessageLocation loc, bool must_resolve, ResolveSet* resolve_set);
static V8_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT bool PrepareInstantiate(
Isolate* isolate, Handle<SyntheticModule> module,
v8::Local<v8::Context> context, v8::Module::ResolveCallback callback);
static V8_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT bool FinishInstantiate(
Isolate* isolate, Handle<SyntheticModule> module, unsigned* dfs_index);
static V8_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT MaybeHandle<Object> Evaluate(
Isolate* isolate, Handle<SyntheticModule> module,
ZoneForwardList<Handle<Module>>* stack, unsigned* dfs_index);
static void Reset(Isolate* isolate, Handle<SyntheticModule> module);
The v8::Module export class in v8\src\include\v8.h will have the following additional items:
// Callback defined in the embedder
typedef v8::MaybeLocal<v8::Value> (*SyntheticModuleEvaluationSteps)(
Local<Context> context, Local<Module> module);
static Local<Module> CreateSyntheticModule(
Isolate* isolate, const std::vector<Local<v8::String>>& export_names,
SyntheticModuleEvaluationSteps evaluation_steps);
void SetSyntheticModuleExport(Local<String> export_name,
Local<v8::Value> export_value);
v8::Module::GetModuleRequestsLength()
will be updated to return 0 for a SyntheticModule
.
v8::Module::CreateSyntheticModule
will be implemented with a call to the following new factory method:
Handle<SyntheticModule> Factory::NewSyntheticModule(
i::Handle<i::FixedArray> export_names,
v8::Module::SyntheticModuleEvaluationSteps evaluation_steps);
SyntheticModule::PrepareInstantiate()
and SyntheticModule::FinishInstantiate()
together implement the corresponding Synthetic Module Record concrete method Instantiate(). PrepareInstantiate
will loop over the module's export_names
, calling Module::CreateExport
on each to create a binding of the name to undefined. FinishInstantiate
simply changes the module's state to kInstantiated.
SyntheticModule::Evaluate()
implements the corresponding Synthetic Module Record concrete method Evaluate(). The implementation will call the evaluation_steps
callback, which is itself expected to make calls back into v8::Module::SetSyntheticModuleExport()
to set the synthetic module's export bindings to non-undefined values.
SyntheticModule::ResolveExport()
implements the corresponding Synthetic Module Record concrete method ResolveExport(). The implementation will do the following:
- Look up the cell for the export name in the
Module::exports
ObjectHashTable
and return it if it exists. - If no such entry exists and
must_resolve
is true, callFactory::NewSyntaxError()
.
Resolution of namespace imports (import * from "./my-synthetic-module"
), will work the same as for JSModule
s with the exception that FetchStarExports
will now early-return if its module
parameter is a SyntheticModule
, as these have no requested modules and no star exports.
Should each instance of the new SyntheticModule class have a v8::internal::Context of its own?
Each instance of the existing Module class (which will end up being called JSModule) has a corresponding Context (of MODULE_CONTEXT_TYPE), since each JavaScript module needs a script context where its module-local variables etc. are stored. Similarly, in the Synthetic Modules Specification, the Instantiate step calls NewModuleEnvironment to create a new Lexical Environment and a new module Environment Record for the Synthetic Module. This is necessary because the Synthetic MR needs a place to set the bindings for its [[ExportNames]]
.
In my understanding so far, V8’s Context
roughly corresponds to a combination of the spec’s Lexical Environment
and Environment Record
. But, I am thinking that Synthetic Modules when implemented in V8 can operate without being paired with a Context
. This is based on the following two observations:
- The consumers of Synthetic MR currently being discussed (JSON and CSS modules) do not run any JavaScript of their own.
- In V8’s implementation of
FinishInstantiate
/ResolveImport
/ResolveExport
, any JS modules importing values from a Synthetic module will lift each imported value’sCell
into the JS module’s ownregular_imports
FixedArray
duringPrepareInstantiate
/FinishInstantiate
, where they will then be directly accessible from the JS module’sContext
when the JS module executes. At no time does the Synthetic Module need to store theCells
for its exports anywhere but in itsexports
ObjectHashTable
(where they would be placed during calls toSetSyntheticModuleExport
and then accessed duringResolveExport
calls triggered by JS modules).
Implementing Synthetic modules without a Context
would significantly simplify their design in various ways; for example they wouldn’t need to manage their own regular_exports
array, which comes with additional baggage for mapping a single local name to multiple export names – something that is not needed by Synthetic modules.
On the other hand, if future consumers of Synthetic Modules wanted to run JavaScript code aside from just calling SetSyntheticModuleExport
, then a need for Synthetic Modules to have their own execution Context
might arise. However I’m not currently aware of any concrete proposals that would require this. My tendency is towards simplicity, rather than introducing anticipatory codepaths that won’t yet have anything to exercise them. So unless there are objections we’ll move forward with the design that does not create a new Context
for each SyntheticModule.
We will introduce the new classes blink::JSModuleScript
and blink::ValueWrapperSyntheticModuleScript
, both deriving from the existing blink::ModuleScript
.
The JavaScript-specific bits of ModuleScript
will be pushed down to the derived JSModuleScript
, but ModuleScript
will otherwise remain the same, containing data and functionality common to both module types. We anticipate that as other module types are introduced, further corresponding derivations of ModuleScript
will be added.
Existing code in Modulator
, ModuleMap
, and ModuleTreeLinker
will continue to work with ModuleScript
with minimal-to-no modification.
The new ValueWrapperSyntheticModuleScript
class is a ModuleScript
that exports a single v8::Value
as the default export via a V8 Synthetic Module.
It is worth noting that Synthetic Module Record is capable of supporting more sophisticated kinds of behavior, but current module proposals (JSON and CSS) only require this relatively simple functionality. Additional types of ModuleScript
with more varied and complex uses of Synthetic Modules could be introduced in the future.
ValueWrapperSyntheticModuleScript
has the following members in addition to those inherited from ModuleScript
:
public:
ValueWrapperSyntheticModuleScript::ValueWrapperSyntheticModuleScript(
Modulator* modulator,
v8::Local<v8::Value> value,
const KURL& source_url,
const KURL& base_url,
const ScriptFetchOptions& options,
const TextPosition& start_position = TextPosition::MinimumPosition());
private:
static v8::MaybeLocal<v8::Value> EvaluationSteps(v8::Local<v8::Context> context, v8::Local<v8::Module> module);
TraceWrapperV8Reference<v8::Value> export_value;
The ValueWrapperSyntheticModuleScript
constructor will do the following:
- Stash the
value
parameter inthis->export_value
. - Call
v8::Module::CreateSyntheticModule()
with a List containing the single name "default" as theexport_names
andValueWrapperSyntheticModuleScript::EvaluationSteps
as theevaluation_steps
callback. - Create a
blink::ModuleRecord
using the result ofCreateSyntheticModule()
and stash it inthis->record_
.
EvaluationSteps
will call v8::Module::SetSyntheticModuleExport("default", this->export_value)
and return an empty MaybeLocal<Value>
.
ModuleScriptLoader
and related classes will be modified to support CSS and JSON modules via ValueWrapperSyntheticModuleScript
.
-
DocumentModuleScriptFetcher::NotifyFinished()
andModuleScriptFetcher::WasModuleLoadSuccessful()
will be modified to let CSS and JSON MIME types through in addition to JavaScript. -
A MIME type field will be added to
ModuleScriptCreationParams
for use inModuleScriptLoader
. -
ModuleScriptLoader::NotifyFetchFinished
will key off of the MIME type inModuleScriptCreationParams
to determine what type of module to create:- For a JavaScript MIME type, a
JSModuleScript
will be created as before. - For a CSS MIME type, the CSS parser will be applied to
params->GetSourceText()
and the resultingCSSStyleSheet
will be used to construct aValueWrapperSyntheticModuleScript
with theCSSStyleSheet
as the wrapped value. - For a JSON MIME type, the JSON parser will be applied to
params->GetSourceText()
and the resulting JSONv8::Value
will be used to construct aValueWrapperSyntheticModuleScript
with the JSON value as the wrapped value.
- For a JavaScript MIME type, a
As we add module types other than JavaScript to the module system, we must be aware that future changes to the module infrastructure may have security implications that, even if benign to JavaScript, may be harmful for other resource types.
For example, even though all modules are loaded with CORS, JavaScript code on the web still must be
aware that it could be loaded cross-origin e.g. via <script src="otherOrigin/victim.js">
.
This is not the case for JSON as there are no web APIs that allow no-CORS loads of JSON resources
(in some cases these too could be loaded via a <script>
but there would be no way to
reach in and access the actual JSON data).
If a 'no-cors' mode was added to the module system, then there would now be a way to load JSON content cross-origin -- which would not have been the case if the hypothetical 'no-cors' module system was limited to JavaScript.
Thus, as we add additional module types we must be exceedingly wary of any changes to the security properties of the module infrastructure overall as there are now security implications for more than just JavaScript resources.