Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Potential WMO adoption April21 #32

Open
5 of 6 tasks
marqh opened this issue Mar 29, 2021 · 2 comments
Open
5 of 6 tasks

Potential WMO adoption April21 #32

marqh opened this issue Mar 29, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
@marqh

Comments

@marqh
Copy link
Contributor

marqh commented Mar 29, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Potential Local Codes for WMo
@marqh marqh self-assigned this Mar 31, 2021
@marqh
Copy link
Contributor Author

marqh commented Mar 31, 2021

On scattered cloud

this is listed in the local table as

WMO tables list cloud heights in units of metres
http://codes.wmo.int/grib2/codeflag/4.2/0-6-11

as GRIB is unit locked and prefers SI units, so a cloud level in kft may be difficult to progress

this is different again from an alternative proposal
cloud amount below 1000 feet above surface level (%)
shared in a doc from @mgange659

I wonder if we are not in a strong position to pursue scattered cloud with WMO given
http://reference.metoffice.gov.uk/grib/grib2/mo--74/4.2/0-6-192

@marqh
Copy link
Contributor Author

marqh commented Mar 31, 2021

Issues raised for ticked entries

https://github.com/wmo-im/GRIB2/issues

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@marqh marqh

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@marqh