You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 21, 2023. It is now read-only.
To search a transcription, the bot currently first tries to look for it in the comment forest of the submission. This can take a lot of API requests and seems to be unreliable sometimes. Afterwards, the bot will check the user's profile.
I propose that we immediately use the user's profile to find the transcription. This has several advantages:
Less code to maintain (and the comment forest API is not really easy to use)
More consistent
Less comments to search, one API request will be enough
If the user didn't include the footer link, but made a comment on a post, we can suggest to recheck the formatting guidelines
Of course we will have to make sure only transcriptions on the actual submission are picked up. We will also have to make sure that multi-comment transcriptions are handled correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To search a transcription, the bot currently first tries to look for it in the comment forest of the submission. This can take a lot of API requests and seems to be unreliable sometimes. Afterwards, the bot will check the user's profile.
I propose that we immediately use the user's profile to find the transcription. This has several advantages:
Of course we will have to make sure only transcriptions on the actual submission are picked up. We will also have to make sure that multi-comment transcriptions are handled correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: