You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Upon map reception, building the likelihood map when a new map is received takes a long time if the map is large (ej. 200mx600m). This is because of the construction of the distance map and then likelihood map in this function.
On a Intel Core i9-9900 CPU this is around 22 seconds for a 200mx600m at 0.05 m/pixel resolution.
What's worse, during this time the node is unresponsive.
There's a related failure mode that is triggered by this, see #469 .
Platform (please complete the following information):
OS: Any.
Beluga version: 2.0.2
How to reproduce
Run any system using beluga and a large map. 200mx600m at 0.05 m/pixel resolution is large enough.
Expected behavior
The node should not go unresponsive for so long.
Actual behavior
Node freezes, lifecycle node complains and actually fails.
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bug description
Upon map reception, building the likelihood map when a new map is received takes a long time if the map is large (ej. 200mx600m). This is because of the construction of the distance map and then likelihood map in this function.
On a Intel Core i9-9900 CPU this is around 22 seconds for a 200mx600m at 0.05 m/pixel resolution.
What's worse, during this time the node is unresponsive.
There's a related failure mode that is triggered by this, see #469 .
Platform (please complete the following information):
Beluga
version: 2.0.2How to reproduce
Run any system using beluga and a large map. 200mx600m at 0.05 m/pixel resolution is large enough.
Expected behavior
The node should not go unresponsive for so long.
Actual behavior
Node freezes, lifecycle node complains and actually fails.
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: