We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Thank you for sharing this project.
I run the cifar10_test.py with the default configuration, and the accuracy of training data is about 50% for top 1and 90% for top 5.
However, for validation data, the accuracy is very low, and the accuracy is 0.154% for top1/5. Please have a look for the following figure.
Any suggestion is appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Thank you for sharing this project.
I run the cifar10_test.py with the default configuration, and the accuracy of training data is about 50% for top 1and 90% for top 5.
However, for validation data, the accuracy is very low, and the accuracy is 0.154% for top1/5. Please have a look for the following figure.
Any suggestion is appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: