You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current implementation assumes perfect observation of all cases. Generalizing beyond this would be nice.
First-pass is probably to assume cases are observed independently with probability $\rho$, yielding $\text{Pr}(j \mid R, k, \rho) = \sum\nolimits_{\ell = j}^{\infty} \text{Pr}_{\text{Binomial}}(j \mid \ell, \rho) \text{Pr}_{\text{NBBP}}(\ell \mid R, k)$
We may also want to set upper limits on $\ell$, which contain some amount of information, via "I really don't think we could have missed more than $\ell - j$ cases."
We will have to give some thought as to how (and whether) to combine incomplete observation with censoring.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current implementation assumes perfect observation of all cases. Generalizing beyond this would be nice.
First-pass is probably to assume cases are observed independently with probability$\rho$ , yielding
$\text{Pr}(j \mid R, k, \rho) = \sum\nolimits_{\ell = j}^{\infty} \text{Pr}_{\text{Binomial}}(j \mid \ell, \rho) \text{Pr}_{\text{NBBP}}(\ell \mid R, k)$ $\ell$ , which contain some amount of information, via "I really don't think we could have missed more than $\ell - j$ cases."
We may also want to set upper limits on
We will have to give some thought as to how (and whether) to combine incomplete observation with censoring.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: